CCR006
Focus human oversight on automated control configurations, exceptions, and performance indicators to detect systemic failures before they affect large transaction populations.
CyberTRIZ analysis · Audit contradiction CCR006 · one of 8,235 worked contradictions published by CyberTRIZ.AI
Regulations
Automated Controls vs Human Oversight
Business ContextAutomated controls can process large transaction volumes consistently and continuously. Excessive reliance on automation can make errors difficult to recognize when configurations, data, assumptions, or system logic are incorrect.
Audit TRIZ ResolutionAutomate deterministic control execution while concentrating human oversight on exceptions, configuration changes, performance indicators, unusual patterns, and conditions where judgment remains necessary.
Applicable TRIZ Principles
Principle 1 – Segmentation separates automated execution from judgment-dependent oversight.
Principle 23 – Feedback monitors control outputs and performance for signs of deterioration.
Principle 28 – Mechanics Substitution automates repeatable control functions while preserving targeted human review.
Expected Outcome
Greater control automation
Preserved human challenge
Earlier detection of automation failures
Lower repetitive control effort
Decision Indicators
Automated control outputs are accepted without meaningful review.
Configuration errors affect large transaction populations before detection.
Employees manually reperform controls already automated effectively.
Control owners cannot explain automated logic.
Human oversight focuses on routine transactions rather than system exceptions.