Testing Depth vs Schedule
Apply risk-based test selection so critical and novel functions receive full coverage while routine low-risk functions reuse validated evidence.
CyberTRIZ analysis · GreenFieldIndustrialProjects contradiction CSO006 · one of 8,235 worked contradictions published by CyberTRIZ.AI
Regulations
Business Context
Extensive testing increases confidence that equipment and integrated systems will perform correctly, but exhaustive testing can consume significant time and delay production when many functions are already well understood or independently verified.
Green Field Industrial Projects TRIZ Resolution
Use risk-based testing that concentrates effort on critical functions, novel configurations, complex interfaces, and failure-sensitive systems. Reuse verified evidence where valid instead of unnecessarily repeating equivalent tests.
Applicable TRIZ Principles
Principle 3 – Local Quality varies testing intensity according to technical risk.
Principle 10 – Prior Action performs appropriate verification before integrated start-up.
Principle 23 – Feedback uses test results to direct additional testing toward areas showing abnormal behavior.
Expected Outcome
Shorter testing duration
Preserved commissioning confidence
Better focus on critical systems
Earlier production readiness
Decision Indicators
Early indicators include:
Standard systems undergo extensive repetitive testing.
Schedule pressure causes critical tests to be eliminated.
Testing intensity is unrelated to failure consequence.
Similar verification is repeated by multiple organizations.
Test programs grow without corresponding risk reduction.