Capacity Achievement vs Reliability
Define capacity demonstration criteria to require sustained reliable operation at nameplate output, not short-duration peaks, before performance acceptance is granted.
CyberTRIZ analysis · GreenFieldIndustrialProjects contradiction CSO016 · one of 8,235 worked contradictions published by CyberTRIZ.AI
Regulations
Business Context
Projects are often evaluated on how quickly nameplate capacity is demonstrated. Pushing equipment and processes toward maximum output before reliability is established can increase failures, trips, degradation, and unstable operation.
Green Field Industrial Projects TRIZ Resolution
Demonstrate capacity progressively while tracking reliability at each operating level. Resolve recurring failure mechanisms before sustained high-load operation and distinguish short-duration capacity demonstration from reliable continuous production capability.
Applicable TRIZ Principles
Principle 15 – Dynamics increases load according to demonstrated equipment capability.
Principle 23 – Feedback uses reliability data to guide capacity progression.
Principle 27 – Cheap Short-Living Objects uses temporary test arrangements where appropriate instead of exposing permanent systems unnecessarily.
Expected Outcome
Higher sustainable capacity
Improved equipment reliability
Fewer production interruptions
More credible capacity demonstration
Decision Indicators
Early indicators include:
Nameplate capacity is reached only for short periods.
Equipment failures increase at higher production rates.
Reliability problems are deferred until after performance testing.
Production repeatedly cycles between maximum output and shutdown.
Capacity achievement is measured without sustained operating criteria.