DT018
Start at a licensing tier matching current usage and negotiate a contractual scaling path to align cost growth with realized, not projected, demand.
CyberTRIZ analysis · Process contradiction DT018 · one of 8,235 worked contradictions published by CyberTRIZ.AI
Regulations
Higher Digital Platform Scalability vs. Lower Licensing Cost
Business Context. Choosing a highly scalable digital platform ensures the organization can grow usage without hitting technical limits, but the licensing models for the most scalable enterprise platforms are often priced to reflect that capability, increasing cost as usage grows.
Process TRIZ Resolution. Rather than committing to the most scalable platform tier from the outset, organizations should start with a licensing tier matched to current usage and negotiate a contractual scaling path that allows capacity to grow predictably as actual demand increases.
Applicable TRIZ Principles
Principle 15 (Dynamics) scales the licensing tier progressively as actual demand grows rather than upfront.
Principle 10 (Prior Action) negotiates a predictable scaling path in advance of anticipated growth.
Principle 3 (Local Quality) matches licensing investment to current, measured usage rather than projected maximum capacity.
Expected Outcome
Scalability available when needed
Controlled licensing cost
Predictable cost growth aligned with usage
Efficient capital allocation
Decision Indicators
The organization pays for platform capacity far exceeding actual usage.
Licensing costs have grown faster than the business value delivered.
No scaling path was negotiated before the initial platform commitment.
Platform tier decisions were based on projected rather than actual demand.
Budget concerns have delayed necessary scaling when demand did materialize.
If several of these indicators are present, the contradiction is likely active and the Process TRIZ resolution above should be evaluated.