FRR013
Require dual-track remediation plans that formally separate immediate containment actions from root-cause corrective actions with distinct milestones and owners.
CyberTRIZ analysis · Audit contradiction FRR013 · one of 8,235 worked contradictions published by CyberTRIZ.AI
Regulations
Rapid Remediation vs Sustainable Correction
Business ContextManagement often faces pressure to remediate findings quickly, particularly when issues are visible to regulators, executives, or audit committees. Rapid corrective actions can reduce immediate exposure but may address symptoms without eliminating the conditions that allowed the problem to develop.
Audit TRIZ ResolutionSeparate immediate risk containment from permanent correction. Temporary measures can reduce exposure quickly while management develops a sustainable solution addressing underlying process, control, technology, capability, or governance causes.
Applicable TRIZ Principles
Principle 11 – Beforehand Cushioning introduces immediate protective measures while permanent remediation is developed.
Principle 1 – Segmentation separates short-term containment from long-term corrective action.
Principle 23 – Feedback verifies whether remediation continues to perform after implementation.
Expected Outcome
Faster risk containment
More sustainable remediation
Lower recurrence
Better corrective-action quality
Decision Indicators
Findings are closed through temporary measures.
Similar issues recur after rapid remediation.
Corrective actions focus primarily on immediate symptoms.
Management prioritizes closure dates over sustainability.
Temporary controls remain in place indefinitely.