FRR024
Standardize remediation quality requirements—ownership, causal alignment, evidence—while tailoring the corrective mechanism to each finding's specific root cause.
CyberTRIZ analysis · Audit contradiction FRR024 · one of 8,235 worked contradictions published by CyberTRIZ.AI
Regulations
Remediation Standardization vs Problem-Specific Solutions
Business ContextStandard remediation approaches simplify implementation and help organizations reuse proven solutions. Different findings may arise from distinct process, technology, behavioral, governance, or capability causes, making one standard corrective action ineffective across all situations.
Audit TRIZ ResolutionStandardize remediation design principles rather than specific solutions. Common requirements for ownership, causal alignment, evidence, validation, and sustainability remain consistent, while the corrective mechanism is tailored to the actual cause and operating environment.
Applicable TRIZ Principles
Principle 6 – Universality preserves common remediation-quality requirements.
Principle 3 – Local Quality adapts corrective mechanisms to the specific problem.
Principle 13 – The Other Way Round designs remediation from the causal mechanism backward rather than starting from a preferred standard solution.
Expected Outcome
More consistent remediation quality
Better cause-specific correction
Reduced repeated failures
Greater reuse of proven practices where appropriate
Decision Indicators
Similar corrective actions are assigned to materially different findings.
Standard remediation templates determine solutions before root causes are established.
Repeated findings occur despite completion of approved standard actions.
Business units reject proven solutions without evaluating applicability.
Remediation consistency is measured primarily by use of identical actions.