FRR029
Permit method changes with documented approval while keeping the original risk-reduction outcome fixed and fully traceable in the issue record.
CyberTRIZ analysis · Audit contradiction FRR029 · one of 8,235 worked contradictions published by CyberTRIZ.AI
Regulations
Remediation Flexibility vs Commitment Discipline
Business ContextCorrective-action plans sometimes require modification because technologies, resources, regulations, dependencies, or business conditions change. Unlimited flexibility can turn commitments into moving targets and allow repeated delays without resolving the underlying exposure.
Audit TRIZ ResolutionPermit controlled changes to remediation methods while preserving the required risk-reduction outcome. Revised actions, milestones, or dates must remain traceable to the original finding and require appropriate approval when they materially affect exposure or completion.
Applicable TRIZ Principles
Principle 15 – Dynamics allows corrective methods to adapt as conditions change.
Principle 6 – Universality preserves the original remediation objective despite implementation changes.
Principle 23 – Feedback uses progress and changing conditions to determine justified modifications.
Expected Outcome
Greater remediation adaptability
Stronger commitment discipline
Fewer artificial deadlines
Preserved risk-reduction objectives
Decision Indicators
Due dates are repeatedly extended without meaningful justification.
Management cannot modify ineffective actions without reopening the entire issue.
Revised remediation plans weaken the original risk-reduction objective.
Changing circumstances make approved actions obsolete.
Issue histories do not preserve changes to commitments.