PG026
Publish safe aggregate governance metrics broadly while restricting case-level sensitive detail strictly to those with a legitimate need to know.
CyberTRIZ analysis · Process contradiction PG026 · one of 8,235 worked contradictions published by CyberTRIZ.AI
Regulations
Greater Governance Transparency vs. Protection of Sensitive Process Data
Business Context. Transparent governance reporting builds trust with stakeholders and regulators, but some governance data, such as details of unresolved investigations or vulnerability findings, must remain protected until resolved.
Process TRIZ Resolution. Rather than withholding all governance detail to protect the sensitive minority, organizations should publish transparent aggregate governance metrics broadly while restricting access to case-level sensitive detail to those with a legitimate need to know.
Applicable TRIZ Principles
Principle 3 (Local Quality) applies different access rules to aggregate metrics versus case-level sensitive detail.
Principle 7 (Nested Doll) hides sensitive case-level detail inside broadly published aggregate reporting.
Principle 24 (Intermediary) uses an access-control layer to mediate who can view sensitive governance detail.
Expected Outcome
Broad governance transparency
Protected sensitive information
Maintained stakeholder trust
Clear access accountability
Decision Indicators
All governance reporting is withheld due to a small sensitive subset.
Stakeholders perceive governance as opaque despite genuine controls in place.
No aggregate reporting exists that could be shared safely.
Sensitive case detail circulates without appropriate access controls.
Transparency requests are denied without a clear classification rationale.
If several of these indicators are present, the contradiction is likely active and the Process TRIZ resolution above should be evaluated.